Who Sets Immigration Policy

11

Immigration policy plays a crucial role in shaping a country’s demographics, economy, and social fabric. It determines who can enter a country, under what conditions, and for how long. But have you ever wondered who is responsible for making these important decisions? In this article, we’ll explore the various entities and processes involved in setting immigration policy in different parts of the world.

In most countries, the central government has the primary responsibility for formulating immigration policy. This is because immigration has far – reaching implications that affect the nation as a whole. For example, in the United States, the federal government plays a dominant role. The executive branch, led by the President, can propose new immigration policies. These proposals are often influenced by economic needs, national security concerns, and social values. The President may also issue executive orders related to immigration, which can have a significant impact on how immigration laws are implemented.

Congress, on the other hand, has the power to pass immigration legislation. Laws such as the Immigration and Nationality Act in the US are the result of congressional action. These laws set the framework for various aspects of immigration, including visa categories, the process for obtaining citizenship, and rules for deportation. In the UK, the British government, with the Prime Minister at its helm, is responsible for devising immigration policies. The Home Office, a government department, is directly involved in implementing these policies, handling everything from visa applications to border control.

In federal countries like the United States and Canada, state or provincial governments also have a say in certain aspects of immigration policy. In the US, states can influence immigration in several ways. For instance, some states have passed laws regarding the employment of undocumented immigrants. They can set requirements for businesses operating within their borders, such as verifying the immigration status of employees. In Canada, provinces play a role in the selection of immigrants through the Provincial Nominee Programs (PNPs). Each province has its own criteria for nominating immigrants who can contribute to its specific economic and social needs. For example, a province with a booming tech industry might prioritize immigrants with skills in information technology.

National parliaments or congresses are key players in the immigration policy – making process. They debate, amend, and pass laws related to immigration. In democratic countries, elected representatives voice the concerns and interests of their constituents. For example, in Australia, the Parliament passes immigration laws. These laws are often the subject of intense debate, with different political parties presenting their views on issues like the number of immigrants to be admitted, the types of visas to be offered, and the treatment of asylum – seekers. In the US Congress, both the Senate and the House of Representatives have committees dedicated to immigration issues. These committees hold hearings, where experts, advocates, and affected individuals can testify. This input helps lawmakers craft more informed immigration policies.

Local legislative bodies, such as city councils or county boards, can also have an impact on immigration at a smaller scale. In some US cities, local governments have passed “sanctuary city” ordinances. These ordinances limit the cooperation between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities, with the aim of protecting undocumented immigrants from deportation. While these local policies cannot override federal immigration laws, they can shape the local environment for immigrants. In other countries, local governments may have a say in issues like housing and social services for immigrants, which can indirectly influence immigration patterns.

As mentioned earlier, the head of state or government, whether it’s a President or a Prime Minister, can have a significant influence on immigration policy. In the US, the President can use the power of the executive office to shape immigration policy in several ways. For example, President Barack Obama implemented the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program through an executive order. This program provided temporary relief from deportation for certain undocumented immigrants who came to the US as children. In the UK, the Prime Minister can set the overall direction of immigration policy. Prime Minister Theresa May, during her tenure, made reducing immigration a key part of her government’s agenda, leading to the implementation of various policies aimed at curbing the number of immigrants.

In every country, there are specific government departments and agencies responsible for implementing immigration policy. In the US, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is a major player. The US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), which is part of DHS, is responsible for processing visa applications, green card petitions, and naturalization applications. The Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency, also under DHS, is in charge of securing the borders and screening people entering the country. In the UK, the Home Office is responsible for a wide range of immigration – related functions, from issuing visas to enforcing immigration laws. In Australia, the Department of Home Affairs manages immigration matters, including visa processing and border security.

Political parties often have distinct ideological stances on immigration, which can shape immigration policy. In many countries, conservative parties tend to be more restrictive on immigration. They may prioritize national security and protecting domestic jobs, leading to calls for stricter border controls and fewer immigrant admissions. For example, in some European countries, right – wing conservative parties have campaigned for reduced immigration, arguing that it puts a strain on public resources and national identity. On the other hand, liberal or left – wing parties generally advocate for more open and inclusive immigration policies. They emphasize the benefits of cultural diversity, the contributions of immigrants to the economy, and the humanitarian aspects of welcoming refugees. In the US, the Democratic Party has often been more supportive of comprehensive immigration reform that includes a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, while the Republican Party has sometimes taken a more hard – line stance on border security and illegal immigration.

During election campaigns, political parties make promises related to immigration to attract voters. These promises can have a real – world impact on immigration policy if the party comes to power. For example, in the 2016 US presidential election, then – candidate Donald Trump made building a wall along the US – Mexico border and reducing illegal immigration major campaign promises. After winning the election, his administration took steps to fulfill these promises, including allocating funds for border wall construction and implementing stricter immigration enforcement measures. In the UK, the Conservative Party’s promise to “take back control” of immigration was a significant factor in the Brexit campaign. After the Brexit vote, the government has been implementing new immigration policies to reduce the influence of EU – wide immigration rules.

Countries often enter into bilateral (between two countries) or multilateral (involving multiple countries) treaties that affect immigration policy. For example, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which has since been replaced by the United States – Mexico – Canada Agreement (USMCA), included provisions related to the movement of certain professionals between the three countries. These treaties allow for the easier movement of workers in specific occupations, such as business people, traders, and investors. In Europe, the Schengen Agreement is a multilateral treaty that allows for the free movement of people within the Schengen Area, which consists of 26 European countries. This means that citizens of Schengen member states can travel between these countries without undergoing border controls for the purpose of short – term stays.

International conventions also play a role in shaping immigration policy. The United Nations Refugee Convention is one such example. This convention, which has been ratified by many countries, sets out the rights of refugees and the obligations of states to protect them. Countries that have ratified the convention are bound to provide protection to refugees who meet the criteria set out in the convention. This can influence a country’s immigration policy when dealing with asylum – seekers. For example, a country may have to process asylum claims in accordance with the principles of the convention and cannot simply turn away refugees who are fleeing persecution in their home countries.

The media has a significant impact on public opinion regarding immigration, which in turn can influence immigration policy. Media coverage of immigration issues, whether it’s stories about the arrival of refugees, the impact of immigrants on the economy, or the challenges of border security, can shape how the public perceives immigration. For example, if the media consistently reports on the positive contributions of immigrants, such as their role in filling labor shortages in certain industries, it can lead to more favorable public attitudes towards immigration. On the other hand, negative or sensationalized reporting about immigrants, such as stories about crime rates among immigrants, can fuel anti – immigration sentiment. Public discourse, including social media discussions, community meetings, and public debates, also plays a role. Grassroots movements, both for and against immigration, can use these platforms to voice their opinions and put pressure on policymakers.

Polls and surveys can provide policymakers with an idea of public sentiment towards immigration. In many countries, polling organizations regularly conduct surveys to gauge public opinion on issues like the number of immigrants to be admitted, the types of immigrants to prioritize, and the treatment of asylum – seekers. For example, if a majority of the public in a country indicates in a poll that they support increasing the number of skilled immigrants to boost the economy, policymakers may take this into account when formulating immigration policy. Conversely, if there is strong public opposition to a particular aspect of immigration, such as the resettlement of refugees, policymakers may face pressure to address these concerns in their policy decisions.

Business associations often advocate for immigration policies that meet the needs of the economy. In many countries, businesses rely on immigrant labor, especially in sectors where there are shortages of domestic workers. For example, in the technology industry in the US, companies often lobby for more H – 1B visas for highly skilled foreign workers. They argue that these workers bring in valuable skills and innovation, which helps US companies remain competitive globally. In the UK, the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) has called for immigration policies that allow businesses to access the talent they need, regardless of nationality. Business associations may also support policies that make it easier for foreign entrepreneurs to start businesses in the country, as this can lead to job creation and economic growth.

Immigrant advocacy groups play an important role in shaping immigration policy. These groups work to protect the rights of immigrants and promote fair and just immigration policies. For example, in the US, the American Immigration Council advocates for comprehensive immigration reform that includes a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. They conduct research, educate the public, and lobby policymakers to support policies that are beneficial to immigrants. Refugee advocacy groups, such as the International Rescue Committee, work to ensure that refugees are treated humanely and have access to protection and resettlement opportunities. These groups use various tactics, including public awareness campaigns, legal challenges, and direct lobbying, to influence immigration policy.

Immigration policy is set through a complex interplay of various entities and factors. Central governments, legislative bodies, the executive branch, political parties, international agreements, public opinion, and interest groups all have a role to play. In different countries, the balance of power and influence among these players may vary. For example, in some countries, the executive branch may have more power in setting immigration policy, while in others, legislative bodies may be more dominant. The process of setting immigration policy is also constantly evolving, influenced by changing economic conditions, social values, and geopolitical events. Understanding who sets immigration policy is crucial for anyone interested in the future of a country’s immigration landscape, whether it’s immigrants themselves, businesses looking for talent, or citizens concerned about the impact of immigration on their communities. As the world becomes more interconnected, immigration policy will continue to be a topic of great importance and debate.